Murakami Takashi's new work revealed
03.04.2009 by Patrick W. Galbraith
I was invited to the special sneak preview of Murakami Takashi's new sculpture at the Kaikai Kiki gallery in Hiroo on Thursday night. As seen in the , it is a deformed little robot boy. His name is Inochi. Despite his noted facination with otaku, Murakami says the work this time has nothing to do with otaku, but is rather a "pure expression of Japanese." As always, this follows a very loose definition of "Japanese," based on eclectic US and domestic pop-culture references:
1) The lttle robot boy from "A.I." is the inspiration; apparently Stanley Kubrick wanted to film this with a much uglier character in a Pinnochio-like tale
2) Japan has a deep history with humanoid robots, all the way from Tezuka Osamu's "Astro Boy" (Kubrick was a fan of Tezuka, says Murakami)
3) The bulbous head looks like ET
4) The robotic parts and thin frame evoke an Evangelion
5) Japanese do not like completed things, thus the imbalance
6) There is a violent and grotesque nature to Japanese cute
The list goes on, but you get the idea - various things strung together to imply some sort of meaning, whatever that is supposed to mean. The sculpture took him six years to make, and Bome was not involved. In fact, Murakami said he wants to get past his associations with the master figure maker, whose works are inextricably tied to Kaiyodo and bishojo figures. I find this particualarly amusing, as Bome's only fault is his expertise. Okada Toshio described the difference between what Bome does and "art" as a matter of meaning: Bome means to make figures that make sense to fans of characters, while art tends to make things that don't make sense and thus are "meaningful." That said, it might be that Murakami has to jettison the simple meanings of bishojo to find "meaning."
Instead of Bome, Murakami brought on board the advertising agency that created the CMs for Softbank. It reminds me more of the . In any case, Murakami again says the gags created using the Inochi character are representative of Japanese humor and sense. You be the judge.
Comment on this article
25.12.2010 · Blog
Kaikai Kiki in Nakano Broadway
Kaikai Kiki, the artist collective and company of Murakami Takashi, has opened an art gallery on the second floor of Nakano Broadway. I was...
24.10.2010 · Blog
Tokyo International Anime Fair in Akihabara
Well, the Tokyo Anime Fair Tokyo International Anime Fair has come and gone again. This time was the autumn addition, the "sister event" of...
19.09.2010 · Blog
'Hardware Girls' launch party
A photographer and journalist, gravure idol and musician, it is tough to pin down Julie Watai, aka Amano Ai, aka Eye Taso. She is as...
01.07.2010 · Features
Momoi Halko: The voice of moe is surprisingly deep!
Interview excerpts and random thoughts
07.06.2010 · Blog
Sucked into the Black Hole AKA 4chan
We just received an "Anonymous" email informing us of Patrick's debut over at 4chan's Otaku Encyclopedia thread. Guess I'll have to sift...
30.05.2010 · Blog
The Politics of Popular Culture
Temple University Japan will be holding two conferences on Japanese popular culture as part of the maid cafes. Each event is 1,000 yen,...
31.03.2010 · Blog
On the prowl for banned goods
I visited an underground collector in Koenji who had literally rooms full of books, CDs and items that had been banned in Japan. He also...
Read on... 0 Comments
25.03.2010 · Blog
Sexy legs, no faces
Just walking through Akihabara and saw this sign for an independently produced erotic video. It is of the sentai-hentai variety, or mixing...
22.03.2010 · Blog
Nippombashi Street Festa 2010
I shot over to Osaka for the Nippombashi Street Festa 2010. It was the sixth annual event, and by all accounts was a little more organized...
3 CommentsComment Page 1 of 1
jetalone wrote on 28.7.2010:
i see. in essence, otaku hate murakami because he is not catering to them.
is there a schism between otaku? are there some who dig his work? i cant imagine the entire community against him.
isnt he very supportive of the japanese art community with his geisai projects etc.? theresx bound to be some overlap between art students and otaku right?
what about the other artists he represents like MR.? is he otaku or just a poser?
however, im not sure i agree with the point about bome not wanting to be an "artist." murakami is saying that the work bome has made and is making should be considered "art." bome doesnt change. his work doesnt change. its just the perceptions of people that do. bome doesnt lose anything. his work is considered art by outsiders instead of toys right?
sorry, i posted a follow up comment before reading your response here. this clarifies things. thanks.
Patrick wrote on 26.7.2010:
@jetalone I think some people feel that he is raiding otaku culture, taking provocative surface elements and making a lot of money with artistic representation, but is at the same time not invested in the culture. For otaku, he may appear to be a fraud. With Bome, his figures are made to look cute - to look like the characters in anime and games and trigger a response in fans. It is a very direct need that he is addressing, and his works have to make sense to the otaku who consume them. Murakami's works are not meant for otaku and don't always make sense to them. That is, he is talking about rather than to otaku. That might rub some people the wrong way. The difference in target audience and valuation of the work is precisely why Bome does not want to be an "artist," despite the pressure Murakami put on him.
jetalone wrote on 26.7.2010:
murakami gave bome a show at kaikai kiki gallery last november with the explicit notion that his work should be considered "art." what is it about murakami that doesn't sit well with people? just trying to understand...